Abstract
There is an urgent need for agricultural systems to intensify sustainably, increasing crop productivity, farmer livelihoods and soil health while using fewer resources. Crop perennialization, the conversion of especially annual grains to perennial forms, has shown such possibility. Here we report the successful breeding of perennial rice and assess its performance and potential. Domesticated, annual Asian rice (Oryza sativa) was hybridized with its perennial African relative Oryza longistaminata. From a single planting, irrigated perennial rice produced grain for eight consecutive harvests over four years, averaging 6.8 Mg ha−1 harvest−1 versus the 6.7 Mg of replanted annual rice, which required additional labour and seed. Four years of cropping with perennial rice resulted in soils accumulating 0.95 Mg ha–1 yr–1 organic carbon and 0.11 Mg ha−1 yr−1 nitrogen, along with increases in soil pH (0.3–0.4) and plant-available water capacity (7.2 mm). Perennial cultivars are strongly preferred by farmers; growing them saves 58.1% of labour and 49.2% of input costs in each regrowth cycle. In 2021, perennial rice was grown on 15,333 ha by 44,752 smallholder farmers in southern China. Suited to a broad range of frost-free environments between 40° N and 40° S, perennial rice is a step change with potential to improve livelihoods, enhance soil quality and inspire research on other perennial grains.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Our ancestors shifted from a diet derived entirely from hunting and gathering to one reliant primarily on farming annual grain crops that were domesticated either directly or indirectly from wild perennial progenitors1,2. This one-sow, one-harvest system underpinned the origins of civilizations and continues to feed today’s societies3. Annual grains, domesticated independently on multiple continents from the beginning of the Neolithic revolution, are currently grown on 60–80% of global croplands, supplying 80% of global food4,5. However, modern high-yielding annual crops require wholesale removal of competing vegetation to establish and typically demand high inputs of energy, pesticides and fertilizers (and, in some cases, labour) to be productive6. The combination of chronic soil disturbance and high inputs often compromises essential ecosystem services, pushing many beyond sustainable planetary boundaries7,8,9. In addition, annual crops typically provide only intermittent coverage of the soil by plants, leaving barren soil vulnerable to heavy rainfall, which carries substantial quantities of soil and nutrients off the land, reducing its fertility and resulting in the eutrophication of downstream aquatic ecosystems10,11,12. This situation occurs especially on marginal lands, which currently support 50% of the world’s population and are at risk of further degradation under annual cropping13,14.
Perennial crops have advantages over annual crops in maintaining important ecosystem functions. Perennial crops generally have a longer photosynthetic season, which increases yearly light interception and enhances productivity15. In addition to permanent living cover, deep roots of perennial crops have been shown to increase nitrogen (N) retention11,12and soil carbon accumulation16,17 and may ultimately require lower rates of fertilizer, pesticide and labour inputs9. Perennial cropping systems can also be managed to produce both grains and forages in mixed crop–livestock systems5,18,19,20,21. By improving labour efficiency and soil quality, perennial cropping systems not only improve farmers’ livelihoods but also benefit the ecological systems required to maintain productivity over the long term20,21,22.
Targeting key grains and oilseeds, including wheat, sunflower, barley, sorghum, buckwheat and rice, international researchers from numerous countries are engaged in developing the perennial counterparts of these annual crops using two breeding strategies: de novo domestication23,24,25 and interspecific hybridization26,27. The grain Kernza® is a perennial that exemplifies de novo domestication of the wild species Thinopyrum intermedium, or intermediate wheatgrass28. The perennial rice (PR) reported here was developed by interspecific hybridization. It was targeted initially at favourable (irrigated) rice production systems, in which paddy fields are bunded and ponded water depth is carefully managed. Nevertheless, rice is cultivated across a wide range of ecosystems, from flood-prone to rainfed lowland and rainfed upland, in which submergence and drought define the crop’s adaptive characteristics29. We report on progress in breeding recently commercialized PR cultivars, including their performance over regrowth cycles and locations, and evaluate the livelihood, ecological and soil benefits of PR cultivation over ten successive seasons. We then examine potential zones for sustainable PR production and consider the prospects, limitations and impacts of research, development, adoption and commercialization of this crop, and hence of perennial grains worldwide.
Breeding PR via interspecific hybridization
A successful interspecific hybridization between the annual domesticated Asian rice Oryza sativa ssp. indica RD23, a cultivar from Thailand (Fig. 1a and Extended Data Figs. 1 and 2a), and an accession of the undomesticated African perennial and rhizomatous O. longistaminata from Nigeria (Fig. 1b and Extended Data Fig. 2b) was achieved by embryo rescue in 199627. The F1 plant (Extended Data Fig. 2c) possessed strong rhizomes, partial pollen fertility and self-compatibility, which provided foundational material for basic research on the genetics of rhizome biogenesis and development in rice and paved the way for breeding PR cultivars27,30.
From wide crosses, it can be difficult to obtain breeding lines with target traits due to linkage drag and low frequency of desirable alleles from the undomesticated parent; therefore, we observed a low frequency of F2s that were perennial, were rhizomatous and had good agronomic characteristics. To circumvent this linkage drag, we used pedigree selection from the best single plant in each generation and screened 7,200 F2s to identify rare individuals with the best combination of traits from both parents for further breeding. In 2007, an exceptional F2 individual, coded 36–1, was selected due to its high pollen fertility and seed-setting rate (greater than 85% and 60%, respectively) and moderately strong rhizome production (Extended Data Figs. 1 and 2d).
Starting from the exceptional F2 36–1, we conducted multiple rounds of self-pollination. In each generation, only one individual with short rhizomes and good pollen fertility was selected for self-pollination, and the crown of the chosen individual was retained. Consequently, we constructed a population with individuals representing successive generations from F1 to F9 (Extended Data Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 1) and used this population to investigate rhizome- and yield-related traits in 2018. As the generations advanced, the agronomic traits gradually changed in the direction of cultivated rice. From F1 to F9, we observed a decrease in rhizome number per plant (from 17 to 4) and rhizome length (from 9.3 cm to 3.4 cm) (Extended Data Fig. 3a,b). Pollen fertility gradually increased, and plant height, tiller number, grain number per plant, seed-setting rate, panicle length and grain size (grain length, width and weight) improved to reach values similar to those of widely planted annual rice (AR) cultivars (Extended Data Fig. 3c–i). These data collectively showed that the PR lines we developed had agronomic traits resembling domesticated AR yet retained from the perennial O. longistaminata parent the ability to regrow vigorously after harvest. From next-generation sequencing, 16.16% of the PR23 genome was O. longistaminata.
More than 20 candidate PR lines derived from self-pollinating the F2 selection 36–1 were evaluated for agronomic traits and perenniality in two multi-year field trials from 2012 to 2017 at ten locations in Yunnan, China and Laos31,32 (Experiments 1 and 2; Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Genotype-by-environment analyses revealed that broad-sense heritability was high for most traits, including yield (0.87 to 0.94) and regrowth rate (0.88 to 0.96), indicating that the selections were stable throughout the region. An especially promising line, subsequently named PR 23 (PR23) (Fig. 1c,d), exhibited high and stable grain yields over multiple years and good performance (Fig. 1e–h) at most locations33,34. PR23 was released to farmers in China in 201835, a key milestone in the commercialization of perennial grains bred via interspecific hybridization. Through further selection, three additional PR lines were successfully bred: PR24, PR25 (released as Yunda25 in China in 202036) and PR101 (Extended Data Fig. 1). PR101 has grain quality similar to its O. sativa ssp. indica parent RD23, which has a high grain length/width ratio of 3.57, whereas PR23, PR24 and PR25 have grain quality traits similar to the typical O. sativa ssp. japonica cultivar Zhonghua 11, including a lower grain length/width ratio of 2.13. These grain qualities should be widely accepted as they are similar to current consumer preferences, except in countries such as Tanzania, Ethiopia and Laos, which have specific grain quality requirements37,38.
In a second round of breeding, our strategy was to transfer perenniality into local elite O. sativa cultivars. A perennial breeding line MP3–235 (later renamed PRB3), with strong perenniality and short rhizomes but (less desirably) a 2 m plant height, strong seed shattering and low grain density (Extended Data Fig. 2e,f), was chosen to cross with an elite indica cultivar, Dianrui 449 (DR449). Three generations of backcrossing (240 lines each) to DR449 as the recurrent parent were performed, followed by several generations of self-pollination. As expected, backcrossing to an elite parent increased the frequency of progenies with desirable agronomic traits relative to the F2 population (Supplementary Table 1). From this backcross breeding, a new PR cultivar, PR107 (DR449/MP3–235//DR449) (Extended Data Figs. 1 and 2g,h), with strong perenniality, high yield and good grain quality, was released as Yunda107 in China in 202039 and as NARORICE-1 (PR107) in Uganda in 2021. Taken together, these results illustrate that our breeding strategy, based on large population size and strong selection for perenniality and pollen fertility in recombinant inbred lines derived from an F2 or backcross population, was effective.
Performance and adoption
We initiated an experiment in 2016 to evaluate the productivity of PR23 in farm-scale plots of 1–13 ha (Experiment 3). This took place at three locations in Yunnan Province, Mengzhe, Menglian and Xinping, where rice is typically planted from seed twice a year. The grain yield of PR23 in Mengzhe over five successive years was 10.9, 8.7, 8.2, 8.1 and 5.3 Mg ha−1 in the first season of each year, respectively, and 6.6, 6.4, 6.2, 6.0 and 3.1 Mg ha−1 in the cooler second season (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 4). These yields (averaging 6.9 Mg ha−1) were comparable to those of the local elite AR Diantun502 (averaging 7.0 Mg ha−1) in eight successive seasons over four years but gradually declined in the ninth season (Extended Data Fig. 4a). Similarly, Menglian PR23 produced higher grain yields (averaging 7.7 Mg ha−1) than the local elite AR Yunhui290 (averaging 7.1 Mg ha−1) in eight successive seasons over four years (Extended Data Fig. 4c). In Xinping, the regrowth crop in spring 2017 (the first regrowth season) was severely damaged by rice hoppers and rats, but grain yields of PR23 were able to recover in the two subsequent seasons (averaging 6.0 Mg ha−1) and showed performance comparable to the local elite AR Wenfu6 (averaging 6.1 Mg ha−1) in the first three seasons; in the following seasons, the yield was consistently lower but stable (Extended Data Fig. 4b). Across the experiment, therefore, PR23 sustainably produced yields averaging 6.8 Mg ha−1 in each of four consecutive years (eight seasons) without re-sowing, and these were comparable to yields from the current leading AR cultivars, which averaged 6.7 Mg ha−1 after being replanted each season (Fig. 2d). Similarly, the more recently released cultivars PR25 and PR107 produced high and stable yields for at least two years and four seasons from a single planting in 2018 at multiple locations (Experiment 4), and these were comparable to yields of PR23 (Extended Data Figs. 5 and 6 and Supplementary Table 5). The high and stable grain yields maintained over eight seasons for PR23 were associated with a high regrowth rate (above 75%) and stable agronomic traits (Extended Data Fig. 4), suggesting PR would need to be resown after about four years. Alternatively, PR could be rotated with a legume pasture or a pulse or brassica crop to provide a break from pests, diseases and weeds and to support other farm enterprises such as livestock while further improving soil health.
Removal of PR after eight harvests, pests, diseases and weeds pose potential threats to successful adoption, and these are considered in detail in Methods, together with strategies to reduce risks. Briefly, adoption of PR is not without risks to the farmer, as 1–2 more herbicide applications were required in PR ratoon cycles than in transplanted AR in our experiments (Supplementary Table 6). While not encountered in our experiments, pests and diseases adapted to high N applications could pose threats under irrigated conditions, especially if pustule loads in stubble are large or insect-transmitted viruses such as tungro become established in regenerating plant crowns. Short rhizomes were intentionally selected in PR so as not to provide substantial weed potential but to permit improved chances of survival and regrowth when harsher conditions were encountered. Under irrigation, therefore, tillage may be required to expose PR crowns to soil drying, perhaps with follow-up glyphosate spraying of young regrowth if needed before re-sowing. Further details are provided in Methods, including on our pest-, disease- and weed-control strategies.
In summary, the three recently released cultivars of PR that we bred (PR23, PR25 and PR107) can produce, from a single planting, high yields over two to four consecutive years for each of four to ten cycles of growth–harvest–regrowth on plants that closely resemble modern O. sativa cultivars (Fig. 2, Extended Data Figs. 4, 5 and 6 and Supplementary Tables 4 and 5), whereas O. sativa cultivars can typically be ratooned at most only once, and with a substantial yield drop in the ratoon crop40,41,42. Therefore, these first cultivars of PR represent a step change that makes ratooning an economically attractive option for irrigated production environments that are not limited in duration by cold weather or other adverse environmental conditions. These cultivars, along with Kernza®21, are also among the first perennial grains to be commercialized. By 2020, PR23 was being grown on over 8,400 ha. In 2020, it was cultivated commercially on 3,818 ha by more than 11,000 smallholder farms, primarily in China (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 7). In 2021, the planting area of PR increased to 15,533 ha, including 44,752 smallholder farms, demonstrating a rapid adoption of PR—a fourfold increase in area and number of farmers in one year.
Livelihood benefits
The prevailing irrigated annual cropping system of rice is labour intensive and thus costly, requiring seedling nurseries, ploughing, transplanting, crop management and harvesting every season. Non-labour costs also include seed, pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers. These expenses lead to low profitability33,34 and insecure livelihoods. To compare the socioeconomics of annual and PR production, we measured the grain yields, labour requirements, inputs costs and returns associated with each. These data are summarized in Supplementary Table 8, which aggregated labour costs for seedling nurseries, ploughing, transplanting, crop management and harvesting. Note that fuel costs are included within ploughing, transplanting and harvesting; fertilizer costs are included within nurseries, ploughing, transplanting and crop management; and pesticide costs are included within ploughing and crop management. Under crop management, the additional cost of each regrowth cycle in Mengzhe and Menglian is for weed control ($74 ha−1 on average), and in Xinping the further $82 ha−1 is for pest control, as noted earlier.
In the first season of our study, costs were similar between annual and PR (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Table 8) for both the labour (US$1,926–2,012 ha−1) and non-labour (US$515–787 ha−1), which accounted for 71.3–79.5% and 20.5–28.7% of total economic cost, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 7a–f). However, in the regrowth seasons, because PR does not require seedling nurseries, ploughing or transplanting to initiate each crop, it was found to have economic savings from lower labour cost (US$1,057–1,206 ha−1) and non-labour costs (US$96–201 ha−1), saving US$1,177–1,401 ha−1 (46.8–51% of the costs of AR) per regrowth season (Fig. 3b, Extended Data Fig. 7a–f and Supplementary Table 8).
Moreover, in each regrowth season, PR production could save approximately 68–77 labour days ha−1 compared with AR, dramatically reducing drudgery and making the management of the PR production system much easier (Fig. 3a). Equally important is that the reduction in human labour requirements is accomplished without substitution by fossil fuel-based equipment, an important consideration as society aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated with agricultural production. During 2016–2020, the net economic benefits of PR in the regrowth seasons at Mengzhe, Xinping and Menglian averaged US$882, US$109 and US$1,165 ha−1 season−1, which were 57.3%, 17.4% and 161% more than elite AR, respectively (Extended Data Fig. 7i and Supplementary Table 8). Thus, even in the case where yields of PR were significantly lower than AR (for example, Xinping), PR always achieved a greater economic return (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 7i). This was confirmed by a sensitivity analysis of net economic gain in response to changes in grain yield, labour inputs and cost inputs. For the second crop in the cycle (re-transplanted AR versus the first regrowth cycle of PR), net economic gain was insensitive to changes in labour input or cost input within each system as the major variation in these parameters was between systems. By contrast, net economic gain was highly sensitive to changes in grain yield, with an extra 1 t ha−1 transplanted AR generating an extra $436, while an extra 1 t ha−1 in each regrowth cycle of PR generated an extra $2,308. Thus, net economic gain was five times as responsive to increase in grain yield in each regrowth cycle of PR than in re-transplanted AR. Adoption of PR would thus reduce farm labour costs, energy use and technological inputs that are required for yearly tillage in annual cropping systems, thereby providing more profits to farmers than AR.
Soil benefits
With soil tillage required for only the initial crop in the cycle, and with less soil disturbance between cycles, PR was expected to provide soil benefits over annual cropping. In the 0–40 cm soil layer, PR cropping over four years resulted in increased soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) at rates of 0.95 and 0.11 Mg ha−1 yr−1, respectively (Fig. 3b, Extended Data Fig. 8 and Supplementary Table 9). We found that the C/N ratio declined significantly in the topsoil over the years in the perennial cropping system (Extended Data Fig. 8l), which could stimulate microbial decomposition of organic matter and result in net N mineralization in the soil43. This predicted enhancement of N cycling due to lower C/N ratios contrasts with apparent net N immobilization of 0.11 Mg ha−1 yr−1 N, which is a consequence of SOC accumulation following the cessation of tillage44,45.
The combined effects of no tillage and increases in organic matter under PR appear to have influenced several other key soil properties, including soil pH, plant-available soil-water capacity and capillary and non-capillary porosity (Extended Data Fig. 8b,c). Soil pH increased significantly by 0.3–0.4 units, with all values falling within the optimal range (5.0–6.5) in rice for nutrient uptake (including phosphorus, copper, zinc and boron) and microbial activity (Fig. 3b). This finding supports earlier work43 that showed SOC stocks of rice paddy soils from 612 sites in 51 countries to be positively correlated with increases in soil pH. Significant increases in plant-available water capacity and porosity have been measured in rice paddy systems with reduced tillage46, and our measured increases in SOC are also likely to have contributed to greater plant-available soil-water capacity47 (Extended Data Fig. 8g–i).
In addition, no tillage retains the soil structure, which can enhance the oxidative capacity of soil methane-oxidizing bacteria and thereby reduce methane emissions40,41, whereas ploughing in annual rice paddies results in an increase of methane emissions by 51.11% (ref. 42). Management of perennial rice with intermittent flooding could further reduce methane emissions by reducing the amount of time soils experience anoxic conditions48. However, there may be a trade-off in which intermittent flooding favours substantially greater pulses of nitrous oxide emissions, resulting in higher total global warming potential48.
Optimal ecological zoning
Low temperature significantly affected the regrowth of PR. In the field experiment, the regrowth rate had a significant quadratic correlation with monthly mean temperature in January 2017 (y = −2.54x2 + 86.33x − 633.98, R2 = 0.73*, P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 10 and Extended Data Fig. 9a). On the basis of this equation, we used a mean monthly temperature of 13.5 °C in the coldest month as the minimum likely to permit at least 75% regrowth in subsequent PR crops. In the controlled environment experiment, the regrowth percentage of PR decreased from 92.2% to 55.4% when temperatures of 4 °C lasted for seven days, while regrowth decreased to 82.8% after five days and 22.4% after seven days at 0 °C (P < 0.05) (Supplementary Table 11 and Extended Data Fig. 9b). From these results, we determined that periods with an average daily temperature lower than 4 °C must last for fewer than five days for PR regrowth to be likely to remain above 75%.
On the basis of these findings for low-temperature effects on regrowth, we assessed which of 25,049 meteorological stations from the National Centres for Environmental Information (https://ncei.noaa.gov) met the criteria. The climates in 2,659 stations were considered potentially suitable for PR cultivation on the basis of cardinal temperatures for regrowth. This suggests that PR has a broad range of potential planting regions, generally within the latitudes of 40° N and 40° S (Fig. 3c).
We recognize that high temperature affecting spikelet fertility around flowering would also impose limits on zones for PR cultivation. Jagadish et al.49 reported that spikelets in rice became sterile when exposed to 33.7 °C around anthesis, although reductions commenced from 29 °C. From meiosis to anthesis to early grain expansion, Nguyen et al.50 reported spikelet sterility commenced as spikelets were exposed to 31 °C from 12 days before anthesis to 12 days after anthesis. Consequently, we conclude that exposure to temperatures of about 31 °C during the month around flowering would be detrimental to spikelet fertility in rice, and the zoning analysis should be extended for these high-temperature limitations. Nevertheless, the estimated ranges of PR and AR are likely to be similar based on temperature alone as cardinal temperatures are considered to be species characteristics51. When other factors (precipitation, evapotranspiration, landscape) are included, however, the range of AR will decline as PR will better cope with abiotic stress (due to extensive root systems and greater assimilate reserves) and in more marginal landscapes (due to lack of soil disturbance, continued soil cover, reduced leaching and nutrient loss, and reduced run-off and soil loss, with run-off and soil loss being of major concern in the sloping rainfed uplands).
Prospects and potential
After more than 20 years of effort, the cultivation of PR has become a reality. This represents a cropping system that simultaneously achieves grain production, labour reduction and ecological security, especially for terraced and fragile farmland. PR has demonstrated good yield potential, and agronomic traits for four years and eight cropping seasons from a single planting can enhance soil fertility and reduce requirements for inputs through ecological intensification. The simplified management, reduced labour requirements and improved livelihood made possible by PR are attractive, so this technology is becoming accepted by increasingly more farmers. This is particularly important because in most countries, rural labour forces have declined due to migration of people to cities, and the application of PR will undoubtedly relieve the work burden of rural farmers, especially women and children, who often provide the unskilled labour52.
Given the recent development of PR, numerous important research questions are just beginning to receive attention. For example, we found more herbicide applications were required in regrowth cycles than in transplanted AR, suggesting the need for improved weed-management agronomy. And while not encountered here, pests adapted to high N applications could pose threats in irrigated systems, especially if pustule loads in stubble were large or insect-transmitted viruses became established in regenerating plant crowns (Performance and adoption and Methods). Finally, understanding management practices that influence the total emissions and relative balance of methane and nitrous oxide trace gasses is critical for understanding total global warming potential of this crop.
Our PR has received certification for commercialization due to the multifaceted benefits it brings, providing a promising solution that reconciles food production with environmental security and the needs of farmers. Recent advances in plant breeding, such as low-cost DNA sequencing, molecular marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and gene editing, can be expected to further accelerate the development of PR in the future, as well as facilitate the perennialization of other crops. Having succeeded in developing a PR adapted for irrigated and favourable lowland conditions, we have now begun breeding PR cultivars suitable for rainfed lowland and importantly for rainfed upland cultivation. PR has great potential for curbing serious erosion and other forms of soil degradation that are common in such marginal lands, especially in upland regions of Southeast Asia53.
Methods
Rice ecosystems and cultural practices
Characteristics of rice ecosystems and their cultural practices have recently been reviewed by Fukai and Wade29. Briefly, rice ecosystems are commonly classified by water availability. The most common is irrigated lowland, in which the paddy field is shallow-flooded after the crop is established until just before harvest. Another major ecosystem is rainfed lowland, in which fields are bunded like in irrigated to maintain ponded water, but with no or limited irrigation, conditions can vary depending on rainfall. Soils may be saturated and anaerobic during the growing season, but in periods of low rainfall, ponded water vanishes, the soil becomes aerobic, and plants quickly encounter water deficit. In flood-prone ecosystem, rice may be submerged, and deep-water or floating rices may be grown. Conversely in upland ecosystem, ponded water is absent, and rice is grown in aerobic soil sometimes on sloping land.
Irrigated rice has traditionally been transplanted into puddled soil, which is cultivated wet to reduce drainage and enhance ponding of water. Transplants have a competitive advantage over newly-emerging weeds, which generally die from anaerobiosis. In addition, soil nutrient availability is improved by puddling, and the paddy favours development of complex food webs for IPM. The disadvantages include labour-intensive cultivation and transplanting, high water use and greenhouse gas emissions and difficulty in establishing post-rice crops into previously puddled soils. Direct seeding into non-puddled soil, and flush irrigation, with ponded water restricted to critical growth phases, have been employed to reduce these problems, although early nutrient availability and weed problems have increased as a consequence. Double cropping of AR is common where temperatures are favourable, and rainfall or irrigation is sufficient. Where cooler conditions are encountered at higher altitude or latitude, however, only one rice crop per year may be harvested from the first season (dry season, December to May in our locations). Conversely, where hotter and drier conditions are encountered, only one rice crop per year may be harvested from the second season (wet season, June to November). PR offers the potential to produce several crop cycles from a single planting, with performance in regrowth cycles dependent on successful survival, regrowth, spikelet fertility and grain yield in the conditions encountered29.
Experimental approach
We conducted five experiments to explore the potential and benefits of PR across field locations in China (Supplementary Table 12). In Experiments 1 and 2, we studied genotype-by-environment interactions from multi-environment trials to examine the effects of selection during breeding, enabling us to estimate variance components and heritability to elucidate patterns of PR adaptation. In Experiment 3, large-plot trials were used to study the performance, long-term productivity and livelihood benefits of PR23, the first PR cultivar released. Trials of PR25 and PR107, subsequent PR releases, were conducted to quantify performance over years and locations (Experiment 4). Finally, PR23 was used to evaluate conditional cold tolerance of PR (Experiment 5). Experimental designs, treatments, cultural practices, data collection and analysis, mean yield and sources of further information are summarized for Experiments 1–4 in Supplementary Table 6, with the main attributes explained briefly for each experiment in the following. Soil constraints, pests, diseases and weeds may pose threats to successful perennial rice cropping, so the following section considers the risks they pose and the mitigation strategies available. Finally, we provide details for socioeconomic and soil measurements and details of the statistical analysis.
Experiment 1
Field trials were conducted in 12 location–season–year (environment) combinations at Jinghong, Menglian and Simao in Yunnan Province of China and at Na Pok in Vientiane Province of Laos in 2012 and 2013. At each location, a randomized complete blocks design was used, comprising 22 genotypes with 2–3 replicates. The 22 genotypes comprised PR derivatives obtained from the cross between O. sativa cultivar RD23 and the wild species O. longistaminata. Specific details about the development of these breeding lines were reported by Zhang et al.54. There were two crops per year at Jinghong and Menglian, but only one crop per year at Simao (first season) and Na Pok (second season). Cultural, measurement and analysis details are summarized in Supplementary Table 6. Briefly, after each harvest, stubble was cut to 10 cm so that consistent stubble for uniform regrowth was available. Mean timings of transplanting and maturation and successive cycles of stubble cut-off and maturation were recorded to define growth duration in each cycle. Regrowth percentage, plant height, grain yield and yield components were recorded from each plot, from 0.9 m2 samples31.
Experiment 2
The trials were conducted in 19 environment combinations at Jinghong, Puer (Simao), Hongta, Wenshan, Yuanyang, Lancang and Dehong in Yunnan Province of China in 2014–2016. The trials at Jinghong (double crop) and Puer (first season) were continued for three years while the others (first season) continued for two years only. At each location, the trial was a randomized complete blocks design comprising nine genotypes with three replications. Five PR genotypes thought to differ in adaptation31, obtained from the cross between O. sativa cultivar RD23 and the wild species O. longistaminata, were included, along with three annual O. sativa cultivar controls32. Cultural, measurement and analysis details were similar to Experiment 1, except a split dressing of 72 kg ha−1 N was applied at boot stage (Supplementary Table 6)32.
Experiment 3
In this field experiment, larger plots of PR23 of 1–13 ha were grown to examine performance, socioeconomics and impact of PR versus AR lines for validation and official release purposes, at Mengzhe, Menglian and Xinping in southern Yunnan province of China, with data collected from 2016 to 2020. Double cropping is the dominant rice cropping system at all three locations, which have a subtropical monsoon climate with mean annual temperature of 18–19.6 °C. The annual rainfall is 869–1,341 mm, which falls mainly in the second season from May to October. The PR PR23 was compared with locally elite AR cultivars selected specifically for each location, which, for Mengzhe, Xinping and Menglian, were Diantun502, Yunhui290 and Wenfu6, respectively (Supplementary Table 6).
Both PR23 and AR were established in the seedling nursery and transplanted to the field. After the first harvest, the straw of PR was cut back to 10 cm above the ground to maintain the uniformity of new tillers arising from rhizomes and to depress tillers from developing from above-ground nodes in each season, with no till being conducted across the successive regrowth cycles. By contrast, for AR, the rice stubble was ploughed after each harvest and the rice was seeded and transplanted as it was in the first season, which is a typical commercial practice in the region. At each location, PR and AR were planted in adjacent plots within the same ecological area. The rice fields were managed by the local farmers under our guidance. During the growth season of PR and AR, the labour and non-labour costs were recorded. At each harvest, yield-related traits (grain yield, duration, regrowth rate, panicle number m−2, spikelet number panicle−1, grain weight and seed-setting rate) were measured.
Experiment 4
Field trials were conducted in Yunnan Province, China, at seven locations: Mengzhe, Menglian, Jinghong, Xinping, Lancang, Wenshan and Yiliang. Measurements at these locations took place over the course of three years, from 2018 to 2020. The management of PR was the same as in Experiment 3. PR25 and PR107 were selected as experiment material, and PR23 as selected as control. At each harvest, yield-related traits (grain yield, duration, plant height, regrowth rate, panicle number m−2, spikelet number panicle−1, grain weight and seed-setting rate) were recorded (Supplementary Table 6).
Experiment 5
Two sub-experiments were conducted to assess the regrowth potential of PR in response to low temperature, with an initial field experiment followed by a controlled-temperature chamber experiment. The first experiment was conducted at 16 field locations in 2016 and 2017 (Supplementary Table 10). At each location, a ratoon crop was exposed to low temperatures in the field in January during early regrowth, and mean monthly temperature and regrowth percentage were recorded. A quadratic equation was fitted to the relationship between temperature and regrowth percentage, and LSD for regrowth percentage (P < 0.05) was obtained.
The second experiment was conducted in a low-temperature plant incubator (model FH-1300, Taiwan Hipoint Co. Ltd) at Yunnan University. Individual plants in 1 cm pots with three replicates were exposed to temperatures of 0 °C or 4 °C for three, five or seven days from the three-leaf stage. Regrowth percentage was recorded for each plant, and means and LSD (P < 0.05) were obtained.
Critical temperatures identified from the two sub-experiments on low-temperature effects on regrowth were then used to assess potential ecological zones for PR. Data from 25,049 meteorological stations worldwide (National Centres for Environmental Information, https://ncei.noaa.gov) were assessed using these criteria, and stations that met the criteria were mapped using GIS to identify potential ecological zones for PR worldwide.
Risks and mitigation
The high and stable grain yields maintained over eight seasons for PR23 were associated with a high regrowth rate (above 75%) and stable agronomic traits (Extended Data Fig. 4), suggesting PR would need to be resown after about four years. We observed that although the regrowth rate showed a decreasing trend over ten seasons, the panicle number m−2 and other grain yield traits were maintained. This indicates an ability of PR to regrow and tiller, which can compensate for the minor decrease in plant stand that may occur in earlier regrowth cycles. In the fifth year (the ninth and tenth seasons), however, grain yield decreased significantly due to a significant decrease in regrowth rate (below 75%), panicle number and spikelet number per panicle (Extended Data Fig. 4). Present cultivars of PR would need to be resown in year 5, preferably by direct seeding into minimum or zero tillage, with stubble cut to a height of 10 cm and excess straw removed if necessary for passage of machinery. Alternatively, PR could be rotated with a legume pasture or a pulse or brassica crop to provide a break from pests, diseases and weeds and to support other farm enterprises such as livestock.
While low temperatures in winter31 or high temperatures and drought in summer55 may reduce regrowth or kill the plant, perennial stubble may also need to be killed under favourable conditions to establish a new crop. Short rhizomes were selected intentionally in PR so as not to provide significant weed potential but to permit improved chances of survival when harsher conditions are encountered. Under irrigation, therefore, tillage may be required to expose the crowns of PR to soil drying, perhaps with follow-up glyphosate spraying of young regrowth if needed before re-sowing. In addition, post-rice crops on puddled soil may encounter difficulties from poor soil structure29, but this problem may be reduced after several ratoon cycles as soil structure parameters generally improved here (Supplementary Table 9). This problem would be minimized by establishing PR by direct seeding without soil puddling, which is becoming more common in rice, especially under conditions of labour scarcity56.
Pests and diseases of rice have been extensively studied. Under irrigated conditions, breakouts of brown plant hopper, green leaf hopper and leaf folder are associated with high N application but can be managed through integrated pest management with split applications of N more closely matching crop demand57. Rust, blast and other leaf and panicle diseases can be severe, but resistance is available in many rice cultivars, and crossing with O. longistaminata may provide additional resistance. These strategies should also be effective for PR. Under rainfed cultivation, pests and diseases are usually less severe although gall midge can be important if ponded water is absent during tiller elongation, and thrips can be damaging locally58. Perhaps of greater concern are insect-transmitted viruses that would remain viable in crowns and diseases with a high pustule load able to re-infect from previous stubble. Viruses of concern may include tungro59 and rice yellow mottle virus in Africa, although PR107 is resistant to the latter from its O. longistaminata parent and has been released in Uganda. Nevertheless, an additional one to two sprays were needed for weed control in regrowth cycles of PR in our experiments, relative to re-transplanted AR (Supplementary Table 6).
In perennial cropping systems, weeds are often observed to build up over cycles, but this may be of less concern in irrigated rice systems, in which timely soil flooding suppresses or kills most weeds early in each crop cycle. Some weeds adapted to anaerobic conditions may survive60, but grazing by ducklings when seedlings are small56 or after harvest by livestock can suppress weeds, together with spot spraying of remaining problems with glyphosate if needed.
Livelihood benefits
In Experiment 3, cooperating farmers were surveyed to establish the timing and details of cultural practices, labour requirements and labour and non-labour costs, which were recorded for both PR and AR systems. The total labour number (persons ha−1) was confirmed by dividing total labour cost (US$ ha−1) by labour price (US$15.63 person−1 on 4 November 2021). Total output was calculated as the product of grain yield and market price (AR, US$0.55 kg−1; PR, US$0.48 kg−1 on 4 November 2021). Net economic gain was obtained by difference, from output minus input.
Soil benefits
Soil samples were collected with three replications after rice harvest in December each year. Core samples for soil nutrients and soil physical properties were obtained over four soil depth increments (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, 30–40 cm) under the PR and AR systems. Soil bulk density was measured from undisturbed cores of known volume, at saturation (upper limit (UL)) and at wilting point (lower limit (LL)) of rice. Undisturbed cores were weighed, dried in a convection oven at 105 °C for 24 hours and weighed again to determine volumetric soil water contents at UL and LL and plant-available water capacity (UL – LL) for each depth increment. From these data, bulk density and soil porosity were also calculated.
Soil nutrients
For soil chemical analysis, core samples were sieved through a 0.25 mm screen. SOC was extracted using the K2CrO7–H2SO4 heat treatment, and residue was determined using the FeSO4 titration of potassium dichromate method61. Soil TN was determined using the Kjeldahl method62. The total accumulations of SOC and soil nitrogen were calculated as the product of SOC × bulk density and TN × bulk density over depth increments, respectively.
Statistical analysis
Genotype-by-environment interactions were examined by joint application of cluster and ordination analysis using CropStat 7.2 (IRRI, http://bbi.irri.org), with further details of those analyses provided elsewhere for Experiment 131 and Experiment 232. Variance components and heritability were also obtained for all parameters from both experiments. For the crop yield data and soil properties, the mean values were calculated for each measurement, and analysis of variance was used to compare the effects of different treatments on the measured variables, with comparisons performed using the LSD test (P ≤ 0.05). LSD is the product of t0.05 and the square root of 2s2/r, where t0.05 is the tabular value of Student’s t for error degrees of freedom at a probability of 0.05, s2 is the pooled error variance, and r is the number of observations per mean. All LSD tests were two tailed, and no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons. Experimental data were analysed with the IBM SPSS statistical package v.20.0 (SPSS, Inc.), and the figures were generated using Origin 2015 (Sys Software, Inc.).
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available within this paper and the Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Sweeney, M. & McCouch, S. The complex history of the domestication of rice. Ann. Bot. 100, 951–957 (2007).
Callaway, E. Domestication: the birth of rice. Nature 514, 558–559 (2014).
Scott, J. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States (Yale Univ. Press, 2017).
Van Tassel, D. L., DeHaan, L. R. & Cox, T. S. Missing domesticated plant forms: can artificial selection fill the gap? Evolut. Appl. 3, 434–452 (2010).
Pimentel, D. et al. Annual vs. perennial grain production. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 161, 1–9 (2012).
Cox, T. S., Glover, J. D., Van Tassel, D. L., Cox, C. M. & DeHaan, L. R. Prospects for developing perennial grain crops. Bioscience 56, 649–659 (2006).
Cox, T. S., Van Tassel, D. L., Cox, C. M. & DeHaan, L. R. Progress in breeding perennial grains. Crop Pasture Sci. 61, 513–521 (2010).
Wan, J. M. Genetic crop improvement: a guarantee for sustainable agricultural production. Engineering 4, 431–432 (2018).
Crews, T. E., Carton, W. & Olsson, L. Is the future of agriculture perennial? Imperatives and opportunities to reinvent agriculture by shifting from annual monocultures to perennial polycultures. Glob. Sustain. 1, e11 (2018).
Rabalais, N. N., Turner, R. E., Sen Gupta, B. K., Platon, E. & Parsons, M. L. Sediments tell the history of eutrophication and hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Ecol. Appl. 17, S129–S143 (2007).
Culman, S. W., Snapp, S. S., Ollenburger, M., Basso, B. & DeHaan, L. R. Soil and water quality rapidly responds to the perennial grain kernza wheatgrass. Agron. J. 105, 735–744 (2013).
Jungers, J. M., DeHaan, L. H., Mulla, D. J., Sheaffer, C. C. & Wyse, D. L. Reduced nitrate leaching in a perennial grain crop compared to maize in the Upper Midwest, USA. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 272, 63–73 (2019).
The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2009 (FAO, 2009).
Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1022 (2008).
Dohleman, F. G. & Long, S. P. More productive than maize in the Midwest: how does Miscanthus do it? Plant Physiol. 150, 2104–2115 (2009).
van der Pol, L., Nester, B., Schlautman, B., Crews, T. E. & Cotrufo, M. F. Perennial grain Kernza fields have higher particulate organic carbon at depth than annual grain fields. Can. J. Soil Sci. 00, 1–5 (2022).
de Oliveira, G., Brunsell, N. A., Sutherlin, C. E., Crews, T. E. & DeHaan, L. R. Energy, water and carbon exchange over a perennial Kernza wheatgrass crop. Agric. For. Meteorol. 249, 120–137 (2018).
Bell, L. W., Byrne, F., Ewing, M. A. & Wade, L. J. A preliminary whole-farm economic analysis of perennial wheat in an Australian dryland farming system. Agric. Syst. 96, 166–174 (2008).
Mosier, S., Córdova, C. & Robertson, G. P. Restoring soil fertility on degraded lands to meet food, fuel, and climate security needs via perennialization. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 706142 (2021).
Glover, J. D. et al. Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains. Science 328, 1638–1639 (2010).
Glover, J. D. & Reganold, J. P. Perennial grains food security for the future. Issues Sci. Technol. 26, 41–47 (2010).
Tilman, D. et al. Beneficial biofuels: the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325, 270–271 (2009).
Ryan, M. R. et al. Managing for multifunctionality in perennial grains crops. Bioscience 68, 294–304 (2018).
Larson, S. et al. Genome mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling domestication traits of intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium). Theor. Appl. Genet. 132, 2325–2351 (2019).
Crews, T. E. & Cattani, D. J. Strategies, advances, and challenges in breeding perennial grain crops. Sustainability 10, 2192 (2018).
Piper, J. K. & Kulakow, P. A. Seed yield and biomass allocation in Sorghum bicolor and F1 and backcross generations of S. bicolor × S. halepense hybrids. Can. J. Bot. 72, 468–474 (1994).
Hu, F. Y. et al. Convergent evolution of perenniality in rice and sorghum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4050–4054 (2003).
DeHaan, L. et al. Roadmap for accelerated domestication of an emerging perennial grain crop. Trends Plant Sci. 25, 525–537 (2020).
Fukai, S. & Wade, L. J. in Crop Physiology: Case Histories for Major Crops (eds Sadras, V. O. & Calderini, D. F.) 44–97 (Elsevier, 2021).
Tao, D. & Sripichitt, P. Preliminary report on transfer traits of vegetative propagation from wild rice species to Oryza sativa via distant hybridization and embryo recue. Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci. 34, 1–11 (2000).
Zhang, S. L. et al. Genotype by environment interactions for grain yield of perennial rice derivatives (Oryza sativa L./Oryza longistaminata) in southern China and Laos. Field Crops Res. 207, 62–70 (2017).
Zhang, S. L. et al. Genotype by environment interactions for performance of perennial rice genotypes (Oryza sativa L./Oryza longistaminata) relative to annual rice genotypes over regrowth cycles and locations in southern China. Field Crops Res. 241, 107556 (2019).
Huang, G. F. et al. Performance, economics and potential impact of perennial rice PR23 relative to annual rice cultivars at multiple locations in Yunnan Province of China. Sustainability 10, 1086 (2018).
Zhang, Y. J. et al. An innovated crop management scheme for perennial rice cropping system and its impacts on sustainable rice production. Eur. J. Agron. 122, 126186 (2021).
PR23, China Rice Data Center, https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/618801.htm (2018).
PR25, China Rice Data Center, https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/623354.htm (2020).
Twine, E. E., Ndindeug, S. A., Mujawamariya, G. & Futakuchi, K. Pricing rice quality attributes and returns to quality upgrading in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 54, 175–196 (2022).
Inthapanya, P., Boualaphanh, C., Hatsadong & Schiller, J. M. in Rice in Laos (eds Schiller J. M. et al.) 325–348 (International Rice Research Institute, 2002).
PR107, China Rice Data Center, https://www.ricedata.cn/variety/varis/623356.htm (2020).
Chauhan, J. S., Vergara, B. S. & Lopez, F. S. Rice ratooning. IRRI Res. Pap. Ser. 102, 19 (1985).
Krishnamurthy, K. in Rice Ratooning (eds. Smith W.H., Kumble Y.) 3–15 (IRRI, 1988).
Xu, F. X. et al. The ratoon rice system with high yield and high efficiency in China: progress, trend of theory and technology. Field Crops Res. 272, 108282 (2021).
Lin, D. Y. & Xie, Y. H. Soil Science 2nd edn (China Forestry Press, 2011).
Kirkby, C. A., Richardson, A. E., Wade, L. J., Conyers, M. & Kirkegaard, J. A. Inorganic nutrients increase humification efficiency and C-sequestration in an annually cropped soil. PLoS ONE 11, e0153698 (2016).
Crews, T. E. et al. Going where no grains have gone before: from early to mid-succession. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 223, 223–238 (2016).
Bhattacharyya, R., Kundu, S., Pandey, S. C., Singh, K. P. & Gupta, H. S. Tillage and irrigation effects on crop yields and soil properties under the rice–wheat system in the Indian Himalayas. Agric. Water Manage. 95, 993–1002 (2008).
Lal, L. Soil organic matter and water retention. Agron. J. 112, 3264–3277 (2020).
Kritee, K. et al. High nitrous oxide fluxes from rice indicate the need to manage water for both long- and short-term climate impacts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9720–9725 (2018).
Jagadish, S. K., Craufurd, P. Q. & Wheeler, T. High temperature stress and spikelet fertility in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1627–1635 (2007).
Nguyen, D. N., Lee, K. J., Kim, D. I., Anh, N. T. & Lee, B. W. Modeling and validation of high-temperature induced spikelet sterility in rice. Field Crops Res. 156, 293–302 (2014).
Montieth, J. L. & Scott, R. K. in Food, Nutrition and Climate (eds Blaxter, K. & Fowden, L.) 127–149 (Applied Science, 1982).
Aryal, U. & Kattel, R. R. Drudgery reduction for women in agriculture sector in Nepal: an analytical study. Arch. Agric. Environ. Sci. 4, 449–463 (2019).
Shim, J. Perennial rice: improving rice productivity for a sustainable upland ecosystem. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 44, 191–201 (2012).
Zhang, S. L. et al. in Perennial Crops for Food Security (eds Batello, C. et al.) 27–38 (FAO, 2014).
Samson, B. K. et al. Performance and survival of perennial rice derivatives (Oryza sativa L./Oryza longistaminata) in Lao PDR. Exp. Agric. 54, 592–603 (2018).
Sengxua, P. et al. Integrated nutrient–weed management under mechanized dry direct seeding (DDS) is essential for sustained smallholder adoption in rainfed lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Exp. Agric. 55, 509–525 (2019).
Teng, P. S. Integrated pest management in rice. Exp. Agric. 30, 115–137 (1994).
Savary, S. et al. Rice pest constraints in tropical Asia: characterisation of injury profiles in relation to production system. Plant Dis. 84, 341–356 (2000).
Jefferson, O. & Chancellor, T. C. The biology and epidemiology and management of rice tungro disease in Asia. Plant Dis. 86, 88–100 (2002).
Rao, A. N., Johnson, D. E., Sivaprasad, B., Ladha, J. K. & Mortimer, A. M. Weed management in dry seeded rice. Adv. Agron. 93, 153–255 (2007).
Ferraro, D. O. & Ghersa, C. M. Quantifying the crop management influence on arable soil condition in the Inland Pampa (Argentina). Geoderma 141, 43–52 (2007).
Zhang, Y. J. et al. Crop yield and soil properties of dryland winter wheat–spring maize rotation in response to 10-year fertilization and conservation tillage practices on the Loess Plateau. Field Crops Res. 225, 170–179 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1302264 and 31660387); provincial key R&D programme (202102AE090008), talent supporting project (YLXL20170010) and platform construction project (2016DH013, 2019HC028) from the Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department; long-term programmes for foreign talent (2010–2020) from the National and Yunnan Provincial Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs; the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M663589); and special funding (2010–2020) from the Land Institute in Salina, Kansas, USA. We thank all researchers who helped in the trials and demonstration of PR in Yunnan Province, China, and over the world. We thank engineer X. L. Zhao from the Meteorological Bureau of Menghai County for help with data analysis and drawing the PR planting optimal ecological zoning map. We thank FAO agree us to reuse part of published photos.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
F.H. and L.J.W. designed the research. S.Z., G.H. and Y.Z. were key players for the field trials. X.L., K.W., J.L., Y.F., J.D., S.W., L.Z. and X.Y. helped organize the field trials in Yunnan Province. S.Z., G.H., Y.Z., X.L., L.H., L.S., J.Z., S.Q., D.T. and L.J.W. collected and analysed the data. S.Z., G.H., Y.Z., E.J.S., T.E.C., J.L., L.J.W. and F.H. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Sustainability thanks Koichi Futakuchi, David Mackill, Clemens Grünbühel and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Extended data
Extended Data Fig. 1 Breeding of perennial rice.
JH and HN refer to Jinghong Station in Yunnan and Hainan Station in Sanya, Hainan, China. FS, first (that is, hot and dry) season; WC or WS, second (that is cool and wet) season in double-crop regions. Red font indicates the different generations. SP1 is Oryza sativa spp. indica RD23 (P1), SP2 is O. longistaminata (P2), and SP3 is RD23 / O. longistaminata (F1). SP4 to SP11 are single individuals selected from the previous generation, with both good fertility and good rhizome characteristics. Yellow boxes indicate O. sativa, purple box indicates O. longistaminata, blue boxes indicate interspecific breeding lines, and orange boxes indicate interspecific cultivars. The numbers of plants evaluated in each generation from F1 to F15 were 1, 1, 1, 7,200, 1,250, 57, 78, 104, 384, 864, 100, 1,078, 1,294, 1,572, 1,403, 1,520 and 1,105, respectively.
Extended Data Fig. 2 Selecting elite breeding lines of perennial rice with strong perenniality.
a, O. sativa RD23 as female parent. b, O. longistaminata as male parent. c, F1 (interspecific hybrid between RD23 and O. longistaminata). d, 36–1 (F2 individual derived from F1). e-f, MP3–235 (F9 individual chosen as a breeding line donor of perenniality for breeding), with desirable short rhizomes, but showing other undesirable agronomic traits, including plant height over 2 m and strong seed shattering. g, Perennial rice cultivar PR107 at maturity. h, PR107 regrowth 3 days after harvest.
Extended Data Fig. 3 Changes in agronomic traits over generations of breeding perennial rice.
a, Rhizome number (plant−1). b, Rhizome length (cm). c, Pollen fertility (%). d, Plant height (cm). e, Tiller number (plant−1). f, Grain number (plant−1). g, seed setting rate (%). h, Panicle length (cm). i, Grain weight (mg). P1, O. sativa RD23 as female parent (red). P2, O. longistaminata as male parent (blue). F1–F9 (black). The error bar represents the standard error of each treatment. Data are presented as means, and l.s.d. for the traits are: a) 4; b) 9.6; c) 2.4; d) 2; e) 20; f) 2,753; g) 7.6; h) 3.0; and i) 1.0 (N = 33; P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Table 1).
Extended Data Fig. 4 Comparison of grain yield and agronomic traits of perennial rice cultivar PR23 from a single planting and replanted annual rice seasonally over five years with 10 seasons during 2016–2020.
The experiment was conducted at three field trial locations in Yunnan, China: Mengzhe (21°57′ N, 100°14′ E, 1,255 m), Xinping (24°02′ N, 101°34′ E, 760 m) and Menglian (22°33′ N, 99°59′ E, 980 m). a-c, Grain yield of annual rice replanted from seed each season and perennial rice planted once in 2016 at three field trial locations (Mg ha−1). The error bar represents the standard error of each treatment. d, Duration of perennial rice (d). e, Regrowth rate of perennial rice (%). f, Panicle number m−2 of perennial rice. g, Spikelet number panicle−1 of perennial rice. h, Grain weight of perennial rice (mg). i, Seed setting rate of perennial rice (%). F1–F5 represent the first seasons of years 1–5. S1–S5 represent the second seasons of years 1–5. The elite annual rice cultivars for Mengzhe, Xinping and Menglian were Diantun502, Wenfu6 and Yunhui290, respectively, and all three locations are double cropping paddy areas. The data are means from Experiment 3, with l.s.d. for these traits being: a-c) 1.7; d) 22; e) 4; f) 96; g) 18; h) 2; and i) 9 (N = 81; P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Table 4).
Extended Data Fig. 5 Grain yield and agronomic traits of perennial rice cultivar PR25 over three years at six locations.
a, Grain yield (Mg ha−1). b, Duration (d). c, Plant height (cm). d, Regrowth rate (%). e, Panicle number m−2. f, Spikelet number panicle−1. g, Grain weight (mg). h, Seed setting rate (%). Field trial locations were double cropping paddy areas in Jinghong (21°59′ N, 100°44′ E, 550 m), Menglian (22°33′ N, 99°59′ E, 960 m), Mengzhe (21°57′ N, 100°14′ E, 1,255 m) and Xinping (24°02′ N, 101°34′ E, 600 m) and single cropping paddy areas in Wenshan (23°23′ N, 104°13′ E, 1,260 m) and Yiliang (24°54′ N, 103°09′ E, 1,600 m). F1–F3 represent the first seasons of years 1–3. S1–S3 represent the second seasons of years 1–3. The data are means from Experiment 4, with l.s.d. for these traits being: a) 1.2; b) 17; c) 8; d) 7; e) 56; f) 14; g) 2; and h) 7 (N = 63; P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Table 5).
Extended Data Fig. 6 Grain yield and agronomic traits of perennial rice cultivar PR107 over two years at five locations.
a, Grain yield (Mg ha−1). b, Duration (d). c, Plant height (cm). d, Regrowth rate (%). e, Panicle number m−2. f, Spikelet number panicle−1. g, Grain weight (mg). h, Seed setting rate (%). Field trial locations were double cropping paddy areas in Jinghong (21°59′ N, 100°44′ E, 550 m), Menglian (22°33′ N, 99°59′ E, 960 m), Mengzhe (21°57′ N, 100°14′ E, 1,255 m) and Xinping (24°02′ N, 101°34′ E, 600 m) and a single cropping paddy area in Lancang (22°26′ N, 99°58′ E, 1,020 m). F1–F2 represent the first seasons of years 1–2. S1–S2 represent the second seasons of years 1–2. The data are means from Experiment 4, with l.s.d. for the traits being: a) 1.2; b) 17; c) 15; d) 1; e) 81; f) 29; g) 2; and h) 7 (N = 42; P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Table 5).
Extended Data Fig. 7 Comparisons of livelihood benefits between perennial rice (PR) and annual rice (AR) cropping systems over five years with ten seasons.
The experiment was conducted at three field trial locations in Yunnan, China: Mengzhe (MZ; 21°57′ N, 100°14′ E, 1,255 m), Xinping (XP; 24°02′ N, 101°34′ E, 760 m) and Menglian (ML; 22°33′ N, 99°59′ E, 980 m). a-c, Labour cost ($). d-f, Non-labour cost ($). g, Labour number input (d). h, Output (gross income $). i, Net economic gain ($). For annual rice, seed, ploughing, seedling nurseries, transplanting, crop management and harvest are needed in every season. For perennial rice, these are all needed in the first season; however, in the subsequent seasons tillers of the plant are accomplished by regrowth, and thus seed, seedling nurseries, ploughing and transplanting are not needed, resulting in considerable savings of money and labour. 1 US$ = 6.4 Chinese Yuan, as of 4 November 2021. The data are means from Experiment 3, with the l.s.d. for labour cost being 101; non-labour cost, 102; labour number, 7; output, 886; and net economic gain, 838 (N = 54; P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Table 8).
Extended Data Fig. 8 Differences in soil structure and nutrients between perennial rice and annual rice cropping systems.
a, Soil pH. b, Soil bulk density (g cm−3). c, Soil porosity (%). d, Capillary porosity (%). e, Noncapillary porosity (%). f, Porosity ratio. g, Saturated upper limit (%). h, Plant available soil water capacity (%). i, Wilting lower limit (%). j, Soil organic carbon (SOC) (g kg−1). k, Total nitrogen (TN) (g kg−1). l, C/N ratio. Within each 10 cm increment of soil depth within each parameter, horizonal bars represent the standard error of different treatments (* P < 0.05; n.s., not significant). AR is annual rice. PR-2y, PR-3y and PR-4y are perennial rice in year 2, year 3 and year 4, respectively. The data are means from Experiment 3, with parameter l.s.d. being: a) 0.54; b) 0.06; c) 2.5; d) 4.6; e) 5.5; f) 0.26; g) 3.6; h) 3.4; i) 0.4; j) 1.6; k) 0.22; and l) 0.29 (N = 48; P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Table 9).
Extended Data Fig. 9 The effect of low temperature and its duration on the regrowth of perennial rice.
a, The relationship between regrowth rate of PR23 and average monthly temperature in January. The data were derived from Yuanjiang, Jinghong, Lancang, Wenshan, Simao, Yiliang, Baoshan, Yudu, Congjiang, Guizhou, Shangsi and Guanyang locations in 2016–2017. The regrowth rate of perennial rice had a significant quadratic correlation with average monthly temperature of January 2017 (R2 = 0.73*, P < 0.05). b, The effect of low temperature and its duration on regrowth rate of PR23. D3, D5 and D7 referred to the duration of low temperature condition for 3, 5 and 7 days, respectively. The error bar represents the standard error of each treatment. The data are means from Experiment 5, with l.s.d. for regrowth of a) 25.7 (N = 48) and b) 3.2 (N = 18) respectively (P < 0.05) (see Supplementary Tables 10 and 11).
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Tables 1–11.
Source data
Source Data Fig. 2a
Source Data of Fig. 2a (country list of perennial rice application over world).
Source Data Fig. 2b
Source Data of Fig. 2b (province list of perennial rice application in China).
Source Data Fig. 2c
Source Data of Fig. 2c.
Source Data Fig. 3a
Source Data of Fig. 3a.
Source Data Fig. 3b
Source Data of Fig. 3b.
Source Data Fig. 3c
Source Data of Fig. 3c (potential perennial rice application area over world).
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3
Statistical Source Data of Extended Data Fig. 3.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4
Statistical Source Data of Extended Data Fig. 4.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5
Statistical Source Data of Extended Data Fig. 5.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6
Statistical Source Data of Extended Data Fig. 6.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7
Statistical Source Data of Extended Data Fig. 7.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8
Statistical Source Data of Extended Data Fig. 8.
Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9
Statistical Source Data of Extended Data Fig. 9.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S., Huang, G., Zhang, Y. et al. Sustained productivity and agronomic potential of perennial rice. Nat Sustain 6, 28–38 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00997-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00997-3
This article is cited by
-
Can the Wild Perennial, Rhizomatous Rice Species Oryza longistaminata be a Candidate for De Novo Domestication?
Rice (2023)
-
Accelerating crop domestication through genome editing for sustainable agriculture
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2023)
-
David Pimentel consistently promoted perennial grains as the future of agriculture
Environment, Development and Sustainability (2023)
-
Fantastic genes: where and how to find them? Exploiting rice genetic resources for the improvement of yield, tolerance, and resistance to a wide array of stresses in rice
Functional & Integrative Genomics (2023)
-
Newer roots for agriculture
Nature Sustainability (2022)